34 Quotes by Ferdinand de Saussure
- Author Ferdinand de Saussure
-
Quote
In fact, from then on scholars engaged in a kind of game of comparing different Indo-European languages with one another, and eventually they could not fail to wonder what exactly these connections showed, and how they should be interpreted in concrete terms.
- Tags
- Share
- Author Ferdinand de Saussure
-
Quote
It is one of the aims of linguistics to define itself, to recognise what belongs within its domain. In those cases where it relies upon psychology, it will do so indirectly, remaining independent.
- Tags
- Share
- Author Ferdinand de Saussure
-
Quote
In general, the philological movement opened up countless sources relevant to linguistic issues, treating them in quite a different spirit from traditional grammar; for instance, the study of inscriptions and their language. But not yet in the spirit of linguistics.
- Tags
- Share
- Author Ferdinand de Saussure
-
Quote
It is only since linguistics has become more aware of its object of study, i.e. perceives the whole extent of it, that it is evident that this science can make a contribution to a range of studies that will be of interest to almost anyone.
- Tags
- Share
- Author Ferdinand de Saussure
-
Quote
Before Latin, there is a period which Greek and Slavic share in common. So this involves the history of language families, as and when relevant.
- Tags
- Share
- Author Ferdinand de Saussure
-
Quote
In attempting to trace the history of a language, one will very soon find oneself obliged to trace the history of a language family.
- Tags
- Share
- Author Ferdinand de Saussure
-
Quote
Of all social institutions language is least amenable to initiative. It blends with the life of society, and the latter, inert by nature, is a prime conservative force.
- Tags
- Share
- Author Ferdinand de Saussure
-
Quote
Psychologically our thought-apart from its expression in words-is only a shapeless and indistinct mass.
- Share
- Author Ferdinand de Saussure
-
Quote
The ultimate law of language is, dare we say, that nothing can ever reside in a single term. This is a direct consequence of the fact that linguistic signs are unrelated to what they designate and that, therefore, 'a' cannot designate anything without the the aid of 'b' and vice versa, or, in other words, that both have value only by the difference between them.
- Tags
- Share