22 Quotes by Kevin Krewell

They've done that in the past with their Celeron lines for lower-priced PCs.

AMD's architecture was really a well-thought, modern, balanced approach. Intel has to catch up. They're getting there, but they're still struggling to get more performance.

There will always be a demand for the super-big and super-fast boxes. But slimmer, and smaller, and more efficient is what the PC companies are looking at right now.

They're recognizing that in some market segments like telecom, mobile handsets and handhelds, the parts tuned for faster speeds are too difficult to use and too power-hungry.

It's disappointing that something they hoped would provide a greater kicker couldn't be there and that they delayed the launch for nine months to close to a year.

It took a little bit longer for these to launch; they said they would be launching them sooner.

It's really not an Apples to Apples comparison, if you will.

The Intel chipset is much more complex. What they don't talk about is that the cost of the chipset will go up significantly.

In many ways, it looks like a server on a chip.