Now we must take the evidence we have and try to answer the fundamental question: What kind of justice will John Roberts be?

Name-calling isn't going to answer the fundamental question of why there hasn't been oversight of the use of this intelligence information, ... And the fact that this administration hasn't even recognized there's been a mistake ...

Why this room should be some kind of cone of silence is beyond me, ... It seems to me this is something of an argument of convenience. Senator Specter said it well, you can answer as many questions as you can to get confirmed ... that's not the right thing to do.

You'll answer only as many questions as necessary to get confirmed. It's not the right thing to do.

It was a strong and nice statement, but didn't answer the fundamental question what kind of justice will he be.

It just makes the burden on him to answer the questions even greater,

If he (Roberts) refuses to answer questions on decided cases, ... I'm going to need a lot more time to try to get to the bottom of who he is.