Take lightly what you hear about individuals. We need not distort trust for our paltry little political agendas. We tend to trust soulless, carried information more than we trust soulful human beings; but really most people aren't so bad once you sit down and have an honest, one-on-one conversation with them, once, with an open heart, you listen to their explanations as to why they act the way they act, or say what they say, or do what they do.

In learning and argumentation, the quality brain is similar to a facility of maximum security. What passes the logic test, free of fallacy and pretense, then must pass the test of biblical accuracy in order to proceed as an adopted, reliable truth.

If you have to say or do something controversial, aim so that people will hate that they love it and not love that they hate it.

A true prophet would rather be believed false by many but actually true than believed true by many but actually false.

The hope is indeed that some will experience and believe: The purpose of a number of spiritual gurus is to demonstrate to God-fearing men faux spirituality.

When everyone believes they are the life coaches, who are the players?

God loves atheists. The former ones make the most compelling theists because they're so empirically familiar with how atheists think.

When you find that a theology has nothing more to offer than what the world already offers, then that theology as a theology is impractical, and therefore, useless.

Every exceptional bias against Christianity I find to be evidence for its validity.