The thing about stereotyping is it's usually just throwing rocks into a crowd hoping to hit somebody who deserves it.

If Christians always seemed to be the most intelligent and the most righteous of men, I'd be a skeptic.

Unsettling are the days in which everyone is an expert.

Every stance unchallenged is positioned to boast on some victorious moral high ground.

A number of our scientists boast intelligence but lack wisdom. I find those to be the predictable ones.

When disinformation is running rampant, there are two ignorances that may emerge: the one is actually positive, a sort of pure and intentional emptying of the mind; but the other is of course negative and clogged and polluted.

So the paradox goes: No man who is really ignorant is ever aware that he is ignorant. That is its finest, most faulty manifestation; there can be no true ignorance without first some claim of intelligence or consciousness, or superiority or enlightenment.

The disruption of science is one which abandons the method and seeks to conquer grounds outside its territory. It is not at all religion but this pseudo-science that is the enemy of science.

It is never just disagreement but always intellectual dishonesty that is the apologist's worst enemy. And its apprentice is ignorance.