The scholarly world rejects Wikipedia as a reliable website that most of the world's silly clowns contribute their ignorance, within the garbage of Wiki-Rules, which also, indeed, contradict each other.

You cannot delete this, whether, with due or undue weight. It is social media, not the Wikipedia.

One cannot trust the Wikipedia since its articles have each minute or continual variant content, in all subjects, which demonstrates the lack of qualification and vision. One may find the most authentic and reliable articles on websites that even have no editorial board.

One can build the castles in two places; in the air, or at the Wikipedia, where the castle makers comment, to reach a consensus that ends on the voting, rejecting all the rules and policies.

If one aspires, to explore the unique idiots and the fools; the Wikipedia has that and such place.