59 Quotes by Danny Sullivan

This will probably calm some of this thing down.

Yahoo has great organization for its service with great relevancy. I think it's going to definitely help build them up for people looking for that kind of content.

Losing the person who is the head of their operations just diminishes credibility for their search and puts a larger question mark behind what they are doing. Overall, the move is not a good sign for their search prospects.

Search engines compile a lot of data on what we search for and much of what we search for is personal. Many people fear that the government wants to do data mining. It'll be interesting to see how much of all this ultimately becomes a political issue.

SEOs will be much more fragmented on different platforms within social networks. It'll help eliminate a lot of the search spammers, but is going to impact on anyone who gets rankings on search engines without having good content.

One million random Web addresses doesn't tell you how many are porn or how many kids had access.

For the smaller services, the challenge is to make some kind of a case for why people would want to stay with them, ... They can argue today that they are more mature and they can offer more tools. This isn't a death knell for the smaller services, but this is a door slamming for them growing more.

If the government wants to estimate how much pornography shows up in the searches, then they are asking for data that is useless to them. You can get that information from other companies.

What will really be interesting is how they actually display it in Web search results.