16 Quotes by John Warden

Netscape, the object of protection in this case, had in market share what the government would call a monopoly until the Great Satan of Microsoft came along. Luckily for the consuming public those theories are just that - theories.

With the greatest respect for your Honor, that isn't enough time for us.

Those contracts were entered into when Microsoft had single-digit usage figures for browser software. Microsoft's contracts are not only completely unobjectionable, but pro-competitive because it reduced Netscape's dominance and gave consumers more choice.

When you don't have the laws or the facts you try to try credibility and that's what I think has driven them to this strategy,

The government has tried to develop and present what I would call a second case -- that is a vague series of allegations that Microsoft is trying to gain a chokehold on the Internet,

And what was Netscape's share of the browser market at the end of June 1997?

Isn't it true that there's nothing in AOL's contract with Microsoft that limits its ability to give its customers Navigator?

Isn't it true that the most important factor for AOL in choosing Internet Explorer was getting software that worked well with AOL's client software?

Isn't it true that Netscape has actually increased the pace of new releases of its browser software as a result of Microsoft's browser software?