I can think of several words to describe a person that has the will to entrust their government with a large share of the income earned from their labor, even though they have witnessed a history of reckless and self-serving use of it. But there is yet a word conceived that adequately describes a person that has the will to entrust a large share of their freedoms to the same government and is without the will to question why they would ever do so.

Political divisiveness is two different and opposing sides of the same coin accusing each other of minting it.

Has the America that has worked so hard to clean its “bigotry closet” found space to include red hats?

I take no issue with the new cancel culture; it acts to obliterate that which is offensive and must surely end by canceling itself.

It may not be politically correct to say that lunatics are running the asylum, but it is correct to say politically they are running the world.

The irony of the media is that it is an arm of a political party while performing the function of an ass.

There are two kinds of lunatics - those that run the asylum and those that run for office.

It's no wonder the media is confusing, after all, it's the arm of a political party that looks like an ass.

There are two kinds of lunatics in the world - those that run the asylum and those that run for office.