#Pluralism
Quotes about pluralism
Pluralism is a concept that celebrates diversity and the coexistence of different perspectives, cultures, and beliefs within a society. It represents the idea that our world is enriched by a tapestry of varied voices and experiences, each contributing to a more vibrant and dynamic community. In a pluralistic society, differences are not just tolerated but embraced, fostering an environment where dialogue and understanding can flourish. This concept is particularly relevant in today's globalized world, where interactions across cultures and ideologies are more frequent and impactful than ever before.
People are drawn to quotes about pluralism because they often encapsulate the beauty and strength found in diversity. These quotes can inspire individuals to appreciate the richness that comes from engaging with different viewpoints and to recognize the value of inclusivity. In a time when division and polarization can seem overwhelming, quotes about pluralism offer a reminder of the potential for harmony and unity amidst diversity. They encourage us to look beyond our own experiences and to find common ground with others, ultimately promoting a more compassionate and interconnected world.
Yet while I do this work because of my faith, I also recognize of course that in a pluralistic society there are many different perspectives. It is both unrealistic and wrong to insist that everyone hold my views, my faith. The place we meet, in our differences, is in the founding documents of our democratic republic.
This is pluralism: not a synonym of relativism, but rather an antonym. Pluralism accepts the moral reality of different kinds of truth, but rejects the idea that they can all be placed on a single scale, measured by a single value.
Takada yang salah dengan halnya rumah ibadah,atau apa saja yang ada di dalamnya;suara-suaraTakada yang salah dengan halnya agama,bahkan apa saja yang ada di dalamnya;kelompok atau individuYang salah hanyalah kepentingan.
if you know whether a man is a decided monist or a decided pluralist, you perhaps know more about the rest of his opinions than if you give him any other name ending in IST. To believe in the one or in the many, that is the classification with the maximum number of consequences.
This stance makes no distinction between (1) the pluralistic standpoint of making sure people have equal rights and (2) the act of co-dependently making sure not to hurt anyone’s feelings, however irrational they may be. We need to stop that nonsense. Getting your feelings hurt, quite frankly, is the price of living a in a free society.
The apple tree never asks the beech how he shall grow, nor the lion, the horse, how he shall take his prey.
Cosmopolitanism must manage the contradiction between its ethos of transcending ethnicity and its need for cultural diversity, which requires ethnic attachment. Bourne resolved this by splitting the world into two moral planes, one for a ‘parental’ majority who would be asked to shed their ethnicity and oppose their own culture, and the other for childlike minorities, who would be urged to embrace their heritage in the strongest terms.
Do you know that those who preach pluralism and human rights,cannot give those rights to the Din of Islam?Those who preach democracy throughout the globe cannot give it to the Palestinians -lest Israel should cry!
It is not a Buddhist approach to say that if everyone practiced Buddhism, the world would be a better place. Wars and oppression begin from this kind of thinking.