#Reviewers
Quotes about reviewers
Reviewers play a pivotal role in shaping our perceptions and decisions, acting as the bridge between creators and audiences. This tag represents the critical eye and insightful commentary that reviewers provide, offering evaluations that can influence everything from the books we read to the movies we watch and the products we buy. People are drawn to quotes about reviewers because they encapsulate the essence of critique and appreciation, often highlighting the delicate balance between subjective opinion and objective analysis. These quotes can inspire us to think more deeply about the art of reviewing itself, encouraging us to appreciate the skill and responsibility involved in delivering fair and constructive feedback. In a world inundated with choices, reviewers help us navigate through the noise, offering clarity and guidance. Their words can resonate with those who value informed opinions and thoughtful discourse, making quotes about reviewers a source of reflection and inspiration for anyone interested in the art of critique. Whether you're a creator seeking feedback or a consumer looking for guidance, the insights of reviewers can profoundly impact your perspective and choices.
The reviewer is a singularly detested enemy because he is, unlike the hapless artist, invulnerable.
Too often do reviewers remind us of the mob of Astrologers, Chaldeans, and Soothsayers gathered before 'the writing on the wall' and unable to read the characters or make known the interpretation.
Then I realized that I was falling victim to one of the fallacies of the bad reviewer (whose habits we already discussed at length in yesterday’s commentary). I was wishing that Hamid had written a different book than he had. How I might have written this story is completely irrelevant. It would be like dismissing The Godfather because I wished it were a musical. The novel needs to be considered on its own terms.
Reevaluate your abilities each time when you have been offered to reviewan article. And say no thanks if the topic doesn’t belong to the field of your expertise.
The main challenges for a reviewer in peer reviewing:- Knowing the field to which a certain manuscript belongs very well.- Having experience in reviewing manuscripts.- Having abilities to make reviewer’s remarks clear.- Having enough time to evaluate the manuscript in depth.- Obeying the editorial deadline for doing a review.- Having a strong interest in scholarly journals.- Being fluent in English.
Until one has some kind of professional relationship with books one does not discover how bad the majority of them are. In much more than nine cases out of ten the only objectively truthful criticism would be “This book is worthless”, while the truth about the reviewer’s own reaction would probably be “This book does not interest me in any way, and I would not write about it unless I were paid to.
[P]ersonally, I know I’d prefer to read an honest review by someone who has no reason to lie, than a book reviewer who has an employer and a publishing house to keep happy.