Andrew P. Napolitano
Andrew P. Napolitano
Full Name and Common Aliases
Andrew Paul Napolitano is a renowned American lawyer, judge, and author who has made significant contributions to the fields of law, politics, and philosophy.
Birth and Death Dates
Born on June 6, 1950, in Brooklyn, New York, Andrew P. Napolitano is still alive.
Nationality and Profession(s)
Napolitano holds dual citizenship of the United States and Italy, reflecting his Italian-American heritage. As a lawyer, he has practiced law for over four decades and served as a judge on the Superior Court of New Jersey from 1987 to 1995. He is also an accomplished author, having written numerous books on law, politics, and philosophy.
Early Life and Background
Growing up in Brooklyn, Napolitano was raised in a traditional Italian-American family. His parents instilled in him strong values of hard work, discipline, and respect for the law. Napolitano's early interest in law and justice led him to attend Princeton University, where he graduated cum laude with a degree in history. He later earned his Juris Doctor (J.D.) from Rutger's School of Law.
Major Accomplishments
As a judge on the Superior Court of New Jersey, Napolitano was known for his commitment to upholding constitutional rights and limiting government power. During his tenure, he issued several landmark decisions that protected individual liberties and challenged the authority of law enforcement agencies. After leaving the bench in 1995, Napolitano continued to advocate for limited government and individual freedoms through his writing and public speaking.
Notable Works or Actions
Napolitano has authored numerous books on law, politics, and philosophy, including "A Nation of Cowards" (2007), "Dred Scott's Revenge: A Legal History of Racism in America" (2009), and "The Battle for the Constitution" (2012). His writing often explores themes of constitutional law, individual rights, and the role of government. Napolitano has also been a frequent guest on television programs such as Fox News, where he shares his expertise on matters related to law, politics, and social issues.
Impact and Legacy
Andrew P. Napolitano's influence extends far beyond his courtroom accomplishments or literary output. As a leading voice for limited government and individual liberties, he has inspired countless individuals to re-examine their assumptions about the role of government in society. His commitment to upholding constitutional rights and challenging government overreach has made him a respected advocate for those seeking to protect their freedoms.
Why They Are Widely Quoted or Remembered
Napolitano's expertise on constitutional law, his experience as a judge, and his prolific writing have cemented his status as one of the most influential voices in American politics. His unwavering commitment to individual liberties and limited government has earned him widespread recognition and respect from scholars, policymakers, and citizens alike. As a result, his quotes, opinions, and writings continue to be sought after by media outlets, researchers, and individuals seeking guidance on matters related to law, politics, and social issues.
Quotes by Andrew P. Napolitano
Speech is one of the few abilities that human beings share across all creeds, faiths, races, and ethnicities. By nature, it connects us, it strengthens us, and it empowers us. Speech as affirmation or as dissent should be cherished and respected.
On Election Day, we select our representatives by secret ballot, and we choose our candidates based on their ability to protect our individual rights, not the rights of the group of people with which we most closely identify.
After September 11th, that all changed for the Pentagon and the CIA, and like the render and torture program, something which began under Clinton and expanded under Bush, would exponentially increase in power under the Obama administration.
The monarchy continued this tradition, and it migrated to America as soon as there was profit to be had.
Up until September 4th 2001, the Department of Defense and CIA were still reluctant to utilize these creepy super-weapons, even to kill bin Laden.
Justice William O. Douglas wrote, “The framers of the Constitution knew human nature as well as we do. They too had lived in dangerous days; they too knew the suffocating influence of orthodoxy and standardized thought. They weighed the compulsions for restrained speech and thought against the abuses of liberty. They chose liberty.
Only problem is, we the people are not asked to choose liberty or security. In fact, we the people are often misled to believe that the only way to protect the homeland is by acquiescing, by placing our freedoms at the feet of our protectors.
Legislators redistrict all the time to achieve desired results. They group people together based on how they think they will vote. There is something fundamentally wrong with this tactic; it is unconstitutional, it is manipulative, it is patronizing, and it infringes upon all citizens’ right to vote.
Which would you choose: To be free or to be secure? State security and personal freedom often run along tense lines with each other, but our Constitution and its philosophical roots clearly bias freedom over safety.
Indeed, Lincoln’s test of a man is also a true test for a nation. To test a nation’s belief in freedom, challenge the people with the emotions of fear and vengeance that often accompany war.