It was a bit lackluster. They seemed to be countering the government on small items, poking holes in specific claims, but they were not telling a bigger story.

It's similar to New York in the sense that there's a really good diverse mix.

Dad's idea was to dress up the front of the buildings with sculptures and artwork. I think Dad's vision was if you build something and commit to improving the exterior aesthetically, it's going to draw more people into the area.

This jury has been listening to some fairly technical testimony for the past 10 weeks, so perhaps they're better schooled on the issues than people were back then.

They sold a few buildings, but then nothing else happened. They had all that land they had to put infrastructure into, and they had run out of cash.