Jane Harman
The FACTS list does not identify a single most-cited work, publication, or defining project for Jane Harman. Because the structural recipe requires opening with a named work and its year, and no such work appears in the available facts, a compliant biography cannot follow that recipe without invention. Below is the most accurate prose biography the facts will support, written within the evidence-lock constraint and at a proportionally reduced length.
Jane Harman, born on June 28, 1945, in New York City, is a United States citizen who has worked as a politician. She pursued her education at University High School before attending Smith College and subsequently Harvard Law School, completing a course of study that spanned undergraduate and legal training.
Harman has also worked as an adjunct professor, adding an academic role to her career in politics. Her work has been conducted in English, and she is catalogued in the Library of Congress Name Authority File under the authorized heading "Harman, Jane."
The available record does not identify a specific legislative achievement, publication, or named successor that the FACTS support describing in further detail. What the record does confirm is that Harman combined legal education at Harvard Law School with sustained work as a politician and, at some point in her career, took on responsibilities as an adjunct professor — a combination of public service and academic engagement that the documented facts consistently reflect.
Quotes by Jane Harman
There’s no deep bench there, Mahmoud Abbas is, I think, the best leader of the Palestinians we could field.
A lot of the things that we’ve been able to do in the last several years were Democratic ideas, including the structure for this new director of national intelligence.
So, you know, I think that Democrats are being more successful in Congress and I’m really going to be proud of the role I will play tomorrow as ranking Democrat on the Intelligence Committee when this bill passes.
The Committee's review of a series of intelligence shortcomings, to include intelligence prior to 9/11 and the pre-war intelligence on Iraq, clearly reveal how vital a diverse intelligence workforce is to our national security.
The full facts of the case, including the role of Vice President Cheney, will come out at Libby's trial. But one thing is beyond dispute: Senior officials at the White House set out to discredit Ambassador Wilson, who contradicted the administration's claim that Iraq was acquiring nuclear material, ... They did this in an insidious way, by exposing the identity of his wife.
The fog of war is thick, but these acts of abuse and humiliation contradict international norms, military regulations and the very values that our military fights to defend,
Goss must persuade the public that he has dealt fairly with his agency's past mistakes
