NH

Noreena Hertz
================

Full Name and Common Aliases


--------------------------------

Full name: Noreena Hertz
Common aliases: None noted

Birth and Death Dates


-------------------------

Born: 1967 (exact date not publicly disclosed)
Death: Still alive

Nationality and Profession(s)


-------------------------------

Nationality: British
Profession(s): Economist, author, and academic

Early Life and Background


--------------------------------

Noreena Hertz was born in 1967 to a family of Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe. Her upbringing had a significant impact on her perspective and interests, particularly with regards to social justice and human rights. Hertz's parents instilled in her a strong sense of empathy and compassion for those affected by social inequality.

Hertz pursued higher education at the University of Cambridge, where she earned a degree in Economics. Her academic background laid the foundation for her future work as an economist and expert on globalization.

Major Accomplishments


---------------------------

Noreena Hertz's career is marked by numerous achievements that have garnered recognition from both academia and the media:

Expertise on Globalization: Hertz has worked extensively on issues related to globalization, trade, and economic development. Her research has been instrumental in shaping policy debates worldwide.
Author of "The Single European Currency": In 1998, Hertz co-authored a book that explored the potential implications of introducing a single currency across Europe. The publication was well-received for its insightful analysis.
Visiting Professor at the University of Cambridge: Throughout her career, Hertz has maintained an association with the University of Cambridge as a visiting professor. This role allows her to contribute to academic discussions and mentor students.

Notable Works or Actions


------------------------------

Hertz's work extends beyond academia and policy circles:

The Power of Human Rights Journalism: In 2001, Hertz co-founded The Guardian's 'Comment is Free' section with Michael Tomasky. This platform allowed her to engage in high-profile debates on human rights issues.
Humanitarian Efforts: Throughout her career, Hertz has been involved in various humanitarian initiatives, including campaigns for refugee rights and economic development programs.

Impact and Legacy


-------------------------

Noreena Hertz's contributions have significantly influenced global discussions:

Informed Policy Debates: Her expertise on globalization has shaped policy decisions worldwide. Governments and international organizations continue to draw upon her research and analysis.
* Inspiring Future Generations: As a visiting professor at the University of Cambridge, Hertz plays an important role in mentoring students and inspiring future leaders.

Why They Are Widely Quoted or Remembered


----------------------------------------------

Hertz's reputation as a leading expert on globalization has led to her frequent appearance in media outlets worldwide. Her ability to distill complex economic concepts into accessible language makes her a sought-after commentator on issues related to global trade, development, and human rights.

By engaging with her work and contributions, readers can gain valuable insights into the impact of globalization and develop a deeper understanding of its far-reaching consequences for individuals and societies around the world.

Quotes by Noreena Hertz

Back in the 1970s, Kodak tried to give $25m to a black civil rights organisation in Rochester, New York. The company's shareholders rose up in arms: making this politically charged offering wasn't the reason they had entrusted Kodak with their money. The donation was withdrawn.
"
Back in the 1970s, Kodak tried to give $25m to a black civil rights organisation in Rochester, New York. The company's shareholders rose up in arms: making this politically charged offering wasn't the reason they had entrusted Kodak with their money. The donation was withdrawn.
You want to challenge experts, because experts get a lot wrong. Doctors misdiagnose one time in five. In the U.S. and Canada, 50,000 people die every year who would not have had to.
"
You want to challenge experts, because experts get a lot wrong. Doctors misdiagnose one time in five. In the U.S. and Canada, 50,000 people die every year who would not have had to.
Women who have managed to get successful normally have had to carve out pretty much their own route for doing it, because there are few roadmaps for how, as a woman, you become successful. You think about having to do it yourself, you carve your own way. Does that relate to being Jewish?
"
Women who have managed to get successful normally have had to carve out pretty much their own route for doing it, because there are few roadmaps for how, as a woman, you become successful. You think about having to do it yourself, you carve your own way. Does that relate to being Jewish?
Without industry, finance and government consciously and collaboratively ensuring that capital flows to where it is needed in order to ensure the scaling up of climate change solutions, whatever deal is agreed risks never being realised.
"
Without industry, finance and government consciously and collaboratively ensuring that capital flows to where it is needed in order to ensure the scaling up of climate change solutions, whatever deal is agreed risks never being realised.
With clothing being designed that allows you to be hugged virtually, video conferencing becoming ever sharper, and our social and romantic lives increasingly taking place online, the gap between the physical and the virtual is getting ever smaller.
"
With clothing being designed that allows you to be hugged virtually, video conferencing becoming ever sharper, and our social and romantic lives increasingly taking place online, the gap between the physical and the virtual is getting ever smaller.
Philanthropists today want input into how their monies are being deployed. The big question is, can governments use this insight to sell the rich the idea of paying more tax rather than spend more on charitable giving?
"
Philanthropists today want input into how their monies are being deployed. The big question is, can governments use this insight to sell the rich the idea of paying more tax rather than spend more on charitable giving?
Language is too complex for a computer to understand. It's not going to be able to make sense of what people are saying en masse. We need a new type of discipline that puts together computer scientists and social scientists, who can add context to the situation.
"
Language is too complex for a computer to understand. It's not going to be able to make sense of what people are saying en masse. We need a new type of discipline that puts together computer scientists and social scientists, who can add context to the situation.
It's not that I am against the rich giving money to charities. I'm all for it, and we should think of ways of encouraging more of it. But I also believe that states, rather than individuals, are ultimately a better bet for delivering a fair and just world and reconciling differing interests.
"
It's not that I am against the rich giving money to charities. I'm all for it, and we should think of ways of encouraging more of it. But I also believe that states, rather than individuals, are ultimately a better bet for delivering a fair and just world and reconciling differing interests.
Consumers, unlike voters, expect an immediate response to their concerns; and companies, unlike governments, do not have the luxury of a mid-term lull.
"
Consumers, unlike voters, expect an immediate response to their concerns; and companies, unlike governments, do not have the luxury of a mid-term lull.
The challenge for corporations, if offices were to become obsolete, is twofold. How will they be able to retain their distinct cultures? And how will they be able to ensure that all employees, wherever they work from, share a united identity and vision?
"
The challenge for corporations, if offices were to become obsolete, is twofold. How will they be able to retain their distinct cultures? And how will they be able to ensure that all employees, wherever they work from, share a united identity and vision?
Showing 1 to 10 of 77 results