Lunch is for wimps.

Anybody who’s been through a divorce will tell you that at one point. they’ve thought murder. The line between thinking murder and doing murder isn’t that major.

In any film there’s always a historical implication.

I’d love to do historical pictures more, but I don’t know if I can.

I don’t think most people in the US realize how important WikiLeaks is and why Julian’s case needs support.

I’m terrible at horror movies, by the way. I get scared so easily.

I’m going to hold onto my Blu-ray collection because I really think it’s hardware and it’s important. I don’t want to live in a cloud, all my life.

We are seeing entertainment become politics and we’re seeing people acting out in ways that are extremely violent and destabilizing. No rules apply. We’re in an era of no rules now, it seems.

I love films. I love fiction films, too. I do. I love making them, but it has to be the right one. Hopefully, I’ll never become a director for hire. It’s horrible to make a film that you’re not really interested in.

But in answer to your question about the conspiracy angle, I think that any historian worth his salt, and this is where I fault Stephen Ambrose and a lot of these guys who attack me – not all of life is a result of conspiracy by any means! Accident occurs alongside conspiracy.