South Carolina State does not get its proportionate share. Why should State be a stepchild? That is what 1954 was about. It's a state-supported institution and it should start there if it's about funding.

These alumni are aware of funding issues confronting their initiative and are committed to accomplishing funding requirements inherent in law school start-up and operation.

Why do (critics) think two are enough in South Carolina?

When I come back and see what's happened, I'm very distraught to see how South Carolina State hasn't advanced.