SG

Full Name and Common Aliases


Stephen Gillers is a well-known American lawyer and academic, widely recognized for his contributions to the field of law.

Birth and Death Dates


Stephen Gillers was born on August 27, 1948. Unfortunately, there is no publicly available information about his date of passing.

Nationality and Profession(s)


As an American national, Stephen Gillers has spent most of his career practicing law in the United States. He is a prominent figure in the field of professional responsibility, with expertise spanning legal ethics, professional conduct, and regulatory compliance.

Early Life and Background


Growing up in New York, Stephen Gillers developed a strong foundation for his future academic pursuits. His early interests in law and ethics eventually led him to attend Yale University, where he earned his Bachelor's degree. After completing his undergraduate studies, Gillers pursued a Juris Doctor (J.D.) at the Harvard Law School.

Major Accomplishments


Throughout his career, Stephen Gillers has accumulated numerous accolades and achievements:

He has served as the Director of the Institute for International Cooperation in Law Practice, where he worked closely with international organizations to develop professional responsibility standards.
As a respected scholar, Gillers has written extensively on topics related to legal ethics and professional conduct. His work has been published in various academic journals and law review publications.
He is also an adjunct professor at the New York University School of Law, where he teaches courses on legal ethics.

Notable Works or Actions


Stephen Gillers' notable contributions to the field of law include:

Authorship: His book "Professional Responsibility: Ethics and Law" has become a standard reference for students and professionals alike.
Policy Development: Gillers has played a crucial role in shaping professional responsibility standards through his work with international organizations.

Impact and Legacy


Stephen Gillers' impact on the field of law is undeniable. His dedication to promoting professional ethics and conduct has inspired generations of lawyers and scholars:

He continues to be a sought-after speaker and expert witness on matters related to legal ethics.
As an advocate for professionalism, Gillers remains committed to enhancing the public's trust in the legal system.

Why They Are Widely Quoted or Remembered


Stephen Gillers' extensive body of work has cemented his status as a leading authority on professional responsibility. His quotes and opinions are frequently sought by media outlets, academic journals, and international organizations:

His unwavering commitment to ethics and professionalism has earned him widespread respect within the legal community.
* As a thought leader in his field, Gillers continues to shape the conversation around legal ethics and conduct.

Stephen Gillers' remarkable career serves as a testament to the power of dedication and expertise.

Quotes by Stephen Gillers

Immanuel Kant would’ve made a lousy lawyer, but a great judge!
"
Immanuel Kant would’ve made a lousy lawyer, but a great judge!
Some trials look as much like the trial of an ordinary criminal case as a Hitchcock film looks like a home movie.
"
Some trials look as much like the trial of an ordinary criminal case as a Hitchcock film looks like a home movie.
Immanuel Kant would've made a lousy lawyer, but a great judge!
"
Immanuel Kant would've made a lousy lawyer, but a great judge!
The lawyer can reveal anything he is not forbidden to reveal. There are rules governing what a lawyer can say publicly about a litigation proceeding and those are meant to balance the interest in public discussion and the interest in an untainted trial.
"
The lawyer can reveal anything he is not forbidden to reveal. There are rules governing what a lawyer can say publicly about a litigation proceeding and those are meant to balance the interest in public discussion and the interest in an untainted trial.
The justice is a law into himself or herself on that issue.
"
The justice is a law into himself or herself on that issue.
It's not a basis for disqualification, so long as neither child is involved in the case.
"
It's not a basis for disqualification, so long as neither child is involved in the case.
It's unfortunate of course that what kept him from the swearing in was an activity that is itself of dubious ethical propriety.
"
It's unfortunate of course that what kept him from the swearing in was an activity that is itself of dubious ethical propriety.
For a court to award that kind of money, the court has to find an utter lack of basis
"
For a court to award that kind of money, the court has to find an utter lack of basis
They suffered because of it, ... They were fearful because of it. They were in need of counseling because of it.
"
They suffered because of it, ... They were fearful because of it. They were in need of counseling because of it.
The rules dealing with gifts don't apply to Justice Thomas because the rules only apply to lower court judges. People give gifts to judges and justices because they have power. And they have power because of their position that they hold in trust. And to suggest that it doesn't matter, no one will care, seems to me to be whistling in the dark.
"
The rules dealing with gifts don't apply to Justice Thomas because the rules only apply to lower court judges. People give gifts to judges and justices because they have power. And they have power because of their position that they hold in trust. And to suggest that it doesn't matter, no one will care, seems to me to be whistling in the dark.
Showing 1 to 10 of 12 results