SH

Full Name and Common Aliases


Stephen J. Hadley is a renowned American diplomat and former government official. His full name is Stephen John Hadley.

Birth and Death Dates


Stephen Hadley was born on March 6, 1947, in New York City. He is still alive as of my knowledge cutoff date.

Nationality and Profession(s)


Hadley is an American national with a career spanning over four decades in the field of diplomacy and government service. His profession includes diplomat, lawyer, and White House official.

Early Life and Background


Stephen Hadley was born to a family with a strong background in law and politics. His father, John B. Hadley, served as a judge, while his mother, Elizabeth L. (née Dooling), came from a long line of judges and politicians. Growing up in a household that valued public service instilled in Hadley the importance of contributing to society.

Hadley's family moved frequently during his childhood due to his father's job, which included stints as a judge and a law professor. This exposure to various settings helped shape his interests and future career aspirations. He attended Phillips Exeter Academy for high school before heading off to college.

Major Accomplishments


Stephen Hadley has had a distinguished career in government service, marked by several significant accomplishments:

National Security Adviser: From 2005 to 2009, Hadley served as the National Security Adviser under President George W. Bush, providing critical advice on foreign policy and national security matters.
White House Staff: Before becoming the National Security Adviser, Hadley worked in various capacities within the White House, including as a senior staff member during the Nixon administration.
Diplomatic Career: Hadley has also had a distinguished diplomatic career, serving in key roles such as Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs.

Notable Works or Actions


Hadley's notable works and actions include his:

Service on the 9/11 Commission: In 2004, he served as the co-chairman of the 9/11 Public Discourse Project.
Testimony before Congress: He has provided critical testimony to Congressional committees on matters related to national security and foreign policy.

Impact and Legacy


Stephen Hadley's impact on American diplomacy and government service is multifaceted:

Shaping Foreign Policy: As National Security Adviser, Hadley played a crucial role in shaping the Bush administration's foreign policy agenda.
Advancing US Interests: Throughout his career, Hadley has worked tirelessly to advance U.S. interests around the world.

Why They Are Widely Quoted or Remembered


Stephen Hadley is widely quoted and remembered for his:

Expertise on National Security: As a seasoned diplomat and former government official, Hadley's insights on national security matters are highly valued.
* Leadership in Government Service: His distinguished career in government service has earned him recognition as a leader and expert in the field of diplomacy.

Quotes by Stephen Hadley

Stephen Hadley's insights on:

The violence seems to be diminishing. They've stared into the abyss a bit. I think they've all concluded that further violence... is not in their interests.
"
The violence seems to be diminishing. They've stared into the abyss a bit. I think they've all concluded that further violence... is not in their interests.
There’s Pam watching anxiously. She doesn’t look anxious though.
"
There’s Pam watching anxiously. She doesn’t look anxious though.
Let’s remember that the revolution in Tahrir Square was not anti-American, it was not anti-Israeli, it was for democracy and freedom. That’s a good thing.
"
Let’s remember that the revolution in Tahrir Square was not anti-American, it was not anti-Israeli, it was for democracy and freedom. That’s a good thing.
We hope and we’ve made clear that the forces need to come out. It needs to be full and complete withdrawal. Our position is it needs to be done as soon as possible so that the elections can be free, fair and free of outside influence.
"
We hope and we’ve made clear that the forces need to come out. It needs to be full and complete withdrawal. Our position is it needs to be done as soon as possible so that the elections can be free, fair and free of outside influence.
He served the president and the vice president well. There is now an indictment. And he is entitled to the benefit of the presumption of innocence,
"
He served the president and the vice president well. There is now an indictment. And he is entitled to the benefit of the presumption of innocence,
But I think one of the things we've all learned from that is that it is important, also, to be clear about dissenting opinions and make sure that dissenting opinions also are given visibility.
"
But I think one of the things we've all learned from that is that it is important, also, to be clear about dissenting opinions and make sure that dissenting opinions also are given visibility.
His approach is to not to try and dominate but to participate as one of equals and listen, and that's what he did. At critical times he made his views obviously clear.
"
His approach is to not to try and dominate but to participate as one of equals and listen, and that's what he did. At critical times he made his views obviously clear.
I think our judgment is: That is a credible claim. But I think that we are going to learn a lot more as the investigation goes forward.
"
I think our judgment is: That is a credible claim. But I think that we are going to learn a lot more as the investigation goes forward.
In terms of the administration and executive branch process, that process has been completed ... There's nothing to reopen. In terms of the CFIUS, process, it's been completed.
"
In terms of the administration and executive branch process, that process has been completed ... There's nothing to reopen. In terms of the CFIUS, process, it's been completed.
I point out that some of the critics today believed, themselves, in 2002 that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. They stated that belief, and they voted to authorize the use of force in Iraq.
"
I point out that some of the critics today believed, themselves, in 2002 that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. They stated that belief, and they voted to authorize the use of force in Iraq.
Showing 1 to 10 of 113 results