Willard Van Orman Quine
Willard Van Orman Quine
==========================
Full Name and Common Aliases
Willard Van Orman Quine was born on June 25, 1908, in Akron, Ohio, to Frank Atwood Quine and Harriet Evans Quine. He is commonly known as W.V.O. Quine.
Birth and Death Dates
June 25, 1908 – December 25, 2000
Nationality and Profession(s)
Quine was an American philosopher and logician who spent most of his career at Harvard University. His work had a significant impact on the fields of philosophy, linguistics, and mathematics.
Early Life and Background
Growing up in Akron, Quine developed an interest in science and mathematics from an early age. He attended Oberlin College, where he studied mathematics and philosophy. After completing his undergraduate degree, Quine went on to study at Harvard University for his graduate degrees. His experiences during World War II had a profound impact on his philosophical views.
Major Accomplishments
Quine's work focused on the foundations of logic, language, and mathematics. He made significant contributions to various areas, including:
Elimination of ontological commitment: Quine argued that scientific theories should be understood as sets of sentences rather than as describing a fixed reality.
Influence on philosophical logic: Quine's work in logic led to the development of modern formal semantics and the critique of traditional notions of meaning and reference.
Critique of analytic philosophy: Quine challenged the dominant views of his time, proposing an empiricist approach that emphasized the role of experience in shaping our understanding of language and reality.Notable Works or Actions
Some of Quine's notable works include:
"Two Dogmas of Empiricism" (1951): A seminal paper that challenged traditional notions of meaning and reference, arguing for an empiricist approach to philosophy.
"Word and Object" (1960): A comprehensive work on the relationship between language and reality, exploring the nature of meaning and reference.
"From a Logical Point of View" (1956): A collection of essays that showcase Quine's development of new philosophical ideas.
Impact and Legacy
Quine's influence extends beyond the fields of philosophy and logic. His work has had a lasting impact on various areas, including linguistics, mathematics, and cognitive science:
Challenging traditional notions: Quine's critiques of analytic philosophy and his proposals for an empiricist approach have shaped the development of modern philosophical thought.
Influence on linguistic theory: Quine's work on meaning and reference has contributed to the growth of linguistic theories, such as generative grammar.
Impact on cognitive science: Quine's ideas about language, cognition, and perception continue to inspire research in cognitive science.Why They Are Widely Quoted or Remembered
Quine is widely quoted and remembered for his:
Innovative ideas: His critiques of traditional notions of meaning and reference have had a lasting impact on the development of modern philosophical thought.
Profound influence: Quine's work has influenced various fields, from linguistics to cognitive science, shaping our understanding of language, cognition, and reality.
Enduring legacy: His ideas continue to inspire research and debate, ensuring his place as one of the most influential philosophers of the 20th century.
Quotes by Willard Van Orman Quine
Willard Van Orman Quine's insights on:
How are we to adjudicate among rival ontologies? Certainly the answer is not provided by the semantical formula “To be is to be the value of a variable”; this formula serves rather, conversely, in testing the conformity of a given remark or doctrine to a prior ontological standard.
A curious thing about the ontological problem is its simplicity. It can be put into three Anglo-Saxon monosyllables: ‘What is there?’ It can be answered, moreover, in a word – ‘Everything’ – and everyone will accept this answer as true.
Nonbeing must in some sense be, otherwise what is it that there is not? This tangled doctrine might be nicknamed Plato’s beard; historically it has proved tough, frequently dulling the edge of Occam’s razor.
Treating ‘water’ as a name of a single scattered object is not intended to enable us to dispense with general terms and plurality of reference. Scatter is in fact an inconsequential detail.
Wyman’s overpopulated universe is in many ways unlovely. It offends the aesthetic sense of us who have a taste for desert landscapes.
The word ‘definition’ has come to have a dangerously reassuring sound, owing no doubt to its frequent occurrence in logical and mathematical writings.
One man’s antinomy is another man’s falsidical paradox, give or take a couple of thousand years.
