Bradley A. Smith
Bradley A. Smith
====================
Full Name and Common Aliases
--------------------------------
Bradley Alan Smith is a renowned American lawyer, author, and First Amendment advocate.
Birth and Death Dates
-------------------------
Born on April 4, 1952, there is no publicly available information regarding his passing.
Nationality and Profession(s)
-------------------------------
American | Lawyer, Author, First Amendment Advocate
Early Life and Background
-----------------------------
Bradley A. Smith was born in the United States to a family that valued education and public service. Growing up, he developed an interest in politics and law, which would eventually shape his career as a lawyer and advocate for constitutional rights.
Smith earned his Bachelor's degree from St. Olaf College in 1974 and went on to attend Harvard Law School, where he received his Juris Doctor (J.D.) degree in 1977. This rigorous education provided him with the foundation necessary to excel in his future endeavors.
Major Accomplishments
-------------------------
Throughout his career, Bradley A. Smith has made significant contributions to various aspects of American law and politics. Some notable achievements include:
Supreme Court Cases: Smith has argued several landmark cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, including _Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. EEOC_ (2012) and _Janus v. AFSCME_ (2018).
Book Authorship: He is a prolific author who has written extensively on constitutional law and policy issues. Some of his notable works include "The Gun Control Puzzle" (1997), "Empowering the People: The Rise of the 99% Movement" (2012), and "The Hidden Welfare State: Unleashing the Instinct to Compete" (2015).
Government Service: Smith served as a Commissioner on the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) from 2005 to 2008, where he played a key role in shaping policy related to antitrust law and consumer protection.Notable Works or Actions
---------------------------
Bradley A. Smith has been involved in numerous high-profile cases and initiatives throughout his career. Some notable examples include:
Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. EEOC: In 2011, Smith argued on behalf of the church, successfully defending its right to hire and fire clergy members based on their religious beliefs.
Janus v. AFSCME: Smith represented Mark Janus in this landmark case, which ultimately led to a Supreme Court ruling that public sector unions cannot collect agency fees from non-union employees.Impact and Legacy
----------------------
Bradley A. Smith's contributions to American law and politics have had far-reaching impacts on various aspects of society. His tireless advocacy for constitutional rights has helped shape the country's legal landscape, while his work as a government official has influenced policy decisions that affect millions of people.
As an author, Smith continues to educate readers about important issues affecting the nation, from gun control and education reform to economic policy and individual liberty.
Why They Are Widely Quoted or Remembered
--------------------------------------------
Bradley A. Smith is widely recognized as a leading authority on constitutional law and policy due to his:
Expertise: His extensive experience as a lawyer, government official, and advocate has earned him a reputation for providing insightful commentary on complex legal issues.
* Authentic Voice: Smith's unwavering commitment to upholding the principles enshrined in the U.S. Constitution has made him a trusted source for individuals seeking guidance on matters related to constitutional rights.
As a respected figure in American law and politics, Bradley A. Smith continues to inspire new generations of lawyers, policymakers, and advocates who share his passion for defending individual liberties and promoting constitutional governance.
Quotes by Bradley A. Smith
The usual test under the Federal Election Campaign Act for whether something counts as a campaign expenditure is whether the obligation would have existed but for the campaign. If so, it is not a campaign expenditure.
The reality is that asking the public to fund political campaigns accomplishes nothing. Candidates continue to seek interest-group support through other channels, both financial and in-kind, and corruption problems abound.
Few developments in campaigning have been as vilified and misunderstood as independent expenditure PACs, or, as they are colloquially known, super PACs.
There is no evidence that super PACs have led to a greater percentage of negative ads.
Ultimately, the court is heading to a doctrine of 'separation of campaign and state.' This doctrine, like separation of church and state or separation of military and civilian authority, is not explicit in the Constitution but flows naturally from its structure and commitment to freedom and democracy.
The next time you download a book on Kindle, buy a Michael Moore screed at Barnes & Noble, or order up a political movie from video on demand, remember that it is the Supreme Court's decision in 'Citizens United' that guarantees you the right to do so.
Incumbents don't like it, but political competition is a good thing. Incumbents usually outspend challengers by better than 3 to 1. Super PACs, which tend to support challengers, have nullified some of this advantage.
Every major federal campaign-finance-reform effort since 1943 has attempted to treat corporations and unions equally. If a limit applied to corporations, it applied to unions; if unions could form PACs, corporations could too; and so on. DISCLOSE is the first major campaign-finance bill that has not taken this approach.
Unlike many in the conservative camp, I accept theories of global warming, and accept that man-made activity has played a part in global warming. My differences have only been on what the solutions should be.
Even leaving aside government policy, whole industries are already making expensive changes around the perceived need to 'go green.' Al Gore and countless other prophets of global catastrophe are making megamillions pushing these expensive solutions. Schoolchildren around the globe are being frightened by tales of impending calamity.