CT

Carl Tobias

57quotes

Carl Tobias: A Life Dedicated to Public Service


==============================================

Full Name and Common Aliases

Carl Tobias is an American law professor and expert on Supreme Court confirmation proceedings. His full name is Carl H. Tobias.

Birth and Death Dates

Carl Tobias was born on August 19, 1947. He is still alive.

Nationality and Profession(s)

Nationality: American
Profession(s): Law Professor, Expert on Supreme Court Confirmation Proceedings

Early Life and Background

Carl Tobias grew up in a family that valued education and public service. His parents instilled in him a strong sense of civic duty, which would later shape his career choices. After completing high school, he attended the University of Tennessee, where he earned his undergraduate degree in 1968.

Tobias then went on to earn his law degree from the University of Texas School of Law in 1971. He began his academic career as a law professor at the University of Tulsa College of Law in 1975 and later moved to the University of Richmond School of Law, where he has been a Distinguished Professor since 2009.

Major Accomplishments

Tobias's expertise in Supreme Court confirmation proceedings has made him a sought-after commentator on the process. He has written extensively on the subject, including articles for The New York Times, The Washington Post, and other major publications. In addition to his academic work, he has also served as a consultant to various organizations, providing insight into the complexities of the confirmation process.

Notable Works or Actions

Some notable works by Carl Tobias include:

The Confirmation Mess: Retrospectives on the Judicial Nomination Process
A Supreme Court for the Common Good

Tobias's writings and commentary have been widely recognized as authoritative, making him a trusted voice in the legal community.

Impact and Legacy

Carl Tobias has had a lasting impact on the field of law through his scholarship and public engagement. His work on Supreme Court confirmation proceedings has shed light on a critical aspect of American governance, demonstrating the importance of a well-informed citizenry in holding elected officials accountable. As a respected voice in the legal community, he continues to inspire future generations of lawyers, judges, and policymakers.

Why They Are Widely Quoted or Remembered

Carl Tobias is widely quoted and remembered for his insightful commentary on Supreme Court confirmation proceedings. His work has been featured in major publications, including The New York Times and The Washington Post. As a leading expert in the field, he continues to be sought out by journalists, policymakers, and scholars seeking guidance on this critical aspect of American governance.

Through his dedication to public service and his commitment to transparency, Carl Tobias has earned a reputation as one of the most respected voices in the legal community today.

Quotes by Carl Tobias

All the survivors and families of people who perished on 9/11 will be called, and it's hard to imagine how to counter any of that.
"
All the survivors and families of people who perished on 9/11 will be called, and it's hard to imagine how to counter any of that.
The juries you draw in federal courts are more favorably inclined to institutional defendants.
"
The juries you draw in federal courts are more favorably inclined to institutional defendants.
He anticipated an attack on him. I have a lot of respect for a judge who, presented with a difficult decision, admits it's going to be tough. He has discharged his oath.
"
He anticipated an attack on him. I have a lot of respect for a judge who, presented with a difficult decision, admits it's going to be tough. He has discharged his oath.
I don't think anybody today sees a reason for a filibuster, but they may after the hearing if the answers are troubling to them or they feel they haven't gotten the answers to important questions.
"
I don't think anybody today sees a reason for a filibuster, but they may after the hearing if the answers are troubling to them or they feel they haven't gotten the answers to important questions.
If he had not testified, it seems likely the jury would have come in in his favor.
"
If he had not testified, it seems likely the jury would have come in in his favor.
By and large, the court is very deferential to this administration and others before it.
"
By and large, the court is very deferential to this administration and others before it.
His behavior is so erratic it's hard to know what his testimony will mean for his case. But he has a right to testify.
"
His behavior is so erratic it's hard to know what his testimony will mean for his case. But he has a right to testify.
They've said airport security was 50 percent of the case, and it was always a difficult case. So now it becomes doubly difficult.
"
They've said airport security was 50 percent of the case, and it was always a difficult case. So now it becomes doubly difficult.
It's too soon to say Merck has momentum. Many people felt the Irvin case was a weak case to begin with. It was a short-term usage case.
"
It's too soon to say Merck has momentum. Many people felt the Irvin case was a weak case to begin with. It was a short-term usage case.
It's always unpredictable saying what the docket will look like in 10 years, ... It could be high-tech, biotech. ... If it were present-day issues, you'd have to take it case by case.
"
It's always unpredictable saying what the docket will look like in 10 years, ... It could be high-tech, biotech. ... If it were present-day issues, you'd have to take it case by case.
Showing 1 to 10 of 57 results