The snag lies not in the laws themselves as we call them “loopholes” but the much anticipated upshots are knocked down by the failure to interpret in the intended perspective.

In the corporate realm, where several laws are in operation, implementation receives a blow when it comes to interpretation and understanding the spirit and purpose of any particular law that may have been designed and promulgated for meeting a particular purpose in the light of the anomalies prevalent in the sector at any given point of time.Thus I would call for establishing a sagacious method of study of law, and study of interpretation of statutes so as to develop the legal fabric.

The punch line is ‘knock the morale of an employee and organizational productivity is punctured’.

The purpose of labor laws/employment laws , is to establish balanced basic rights of both the groups(employer – employee) each having a contributive impact on the economy, while the law makers strategically deduce through conflicting maze of interests principles and guidelines ,ironing out the furrows with balanced promulgation.

Employer and employee are both ' contributors ' to socio economic development of any nation

The services of any employee may be terminated, but based on a “established reasonable ground” and not just any nebulous raison d’être.

A good 'Human Resources Policy' must revolves around fair and equitable recruitment process which identifies competent candidates who match the requirements of the Company, through a viable selection process.

Fiction may amuse us, but reality instills lessons to be imbibed through experience; to 'live' this stark reality called 'life' as a blessing, whereas some foolishly waste it by following fiction and fictitious characters.

A good recruitment policy and process of a company should always be designed by integrating organizational goals with employee needs , further with the aim of optimum utilization of manpower as its resource.

Precipitous decisions by companies pertaining to employees, devoid of documented established ground of denial of any of the demands or rights sought by the employees, or as adumbrated in law, would be construed in all probability unpalatable by the labor department and Judiciary.