Laurie Levenson
Laurie Levenson
================
Full Name and Common Aliases
--------------------------------
Laurie Levenson is a renowned American law professor and author. Her full name is Laurie R. Levenson.
Birth and Death Dates
-------------------------
Born: October 31, 1959 (age 63)
Levenson's birthdate is publicly available, but her death date, if any, is not recorded in the public domain.
Nationality and Profession(s)
--------------------------------
Nationality: American
Profession(s): Law Professor, Author
Levenson is a respected figure in her field, known for her expertise in criminal law and procedure. She has spent many years teaching at Loyola Law School and has authored several books on the subject of crime and justice.
Early Life and Background
-----------------------------
Growing up in a family with strong values and a commitment to social justice, Levenson's interest in law was instilled from an early age. Her parents' influence played a significant role in shaping her future career path. After completing her undergraduate degree, she went on to earn her Juris Doctor (J.D.) from the Loyola Law School.
Major Accomplishments
---------------------------
Throughout her distinguished career, Levenson has achieved numerous milestones:
Author of several books: Her notable works include "When Justice Fails: The Unfolding Tragedy of Race in America" and "The Death Penalty and the Law."
Recipient of prestigious awards: She has been recognized with various honors for her contributions to the field, including the American Bar Association's (ABA) Outstanding Professor Award.
Invited speaker and expert witness: Levenson frequently presents at conferences and provides expert testimony in high-profile cases, lending her expertise to key discussions surrounding crime and justice.Notable Works or Actions
------------------------------
Levenson has been a prominent voice on issues related to crime and justice. Her notable works include:
Books: Her writing often explores the complexities of the U.S. justice system, shedding light on systemic inequalities and offering insights into the human impact of crime.
Expert commentary: As an expert in her field, Levenson's opinions are frequently sought by media outlets and publications.
Teaching and mentorship: Through her role at Loyola Law School, she has mentored numerous students, many of whom have gone on to successful careers in law.
Impact and Legacy
-------------------------
Levenson's dedication to teaching, writing, and advocacy has significantly contributed to shaping public discourse around crime and justice. Her legacy is marked by:
Raising awareness about systemic issues: Levenson's work highlights the need for reform in areas such as racial bias and wrongful convictions.
Inspiring future generations of lawyers: Through her mentorship and teaching, she has helped shape the next generation of legal professionals committed to justice.
Why They Are Widely Quoted or Remembered
------------------------------------------------
Laurie Levenson is widely quoted and remembered for her:
Expertise in criminal law: Her extensive knowledge and experience make her a respected voice on matters related to crime and procedure.
Passion for social justice: Levenson's commitment to addressing systemic issues has earned her recognition as a champion of equality and fairness.
* Influence through teaching and writing: Her work continues to inspire discussions, educate the public, and shape policy conversations in the field.
Quotes by Laurie Levenson
The constitutional presumption is for openness in the courts, but we have to ask whether we are really honoring that. What are the reasons for so many cases remaining under seal?
If he does cooperate, it could be a blockbuster. They need an insider ... without one it's going to be difficult for prosecutors.
He's such a good salesman that they didn't have a clue about what he was doing. I don't think prosecutors start out suspecting their own witnesses to be criminals.
On a show like 'CSI,' they do all these amazing investigative techniques. But I don't know of a prosecutor's office in the country that has the resources, or the technology.
It won't escape the jury that this guy is not all there. I'm not sure that makes a huge difference in the guilt phase except for softening up the jury for the penalty phase.
The big issue would be if there was illegally obtained evidence. It could lead to motions for new trials on cases that have been resolved. This case could cause a major disruption.
It's a hornet's nest. There are many types of lawsuits that can be brought against many different people. There will be plenty of work to go around.
This is probably the most important phase of jury selection, and jury selection may be the most important phase of the trial, ... This will be the chance for lawyers to see whether these are jurors with an agenda.
That's horrifying. When I was a prosecutor from 1981 to 1989, I never heard of secret dockets.