Roberto Mangabeira Unger
Roberto Mangabeira Unger
#### Full Name and Common Aliases
Roberto Mangabeira Unger is commonly known as Roberto Unger.
Birth and Death Dates
Born on March 14, 1947. Currently active and alive.
Nationality and Profession(s)
Brazilian philosopher, lawyer, politician, and writer. He has also worked as a professor of law at Harvard University.
Early Life and Background
Roberto Mangabeira Unger was born in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil on March 14, 1947. His father was a judge and his mother was a teacher. Growing up in a middle-class family, Unger developed an interest in politics and social justice from an early age.
Major Accomplishments
Unger's academic career has been marked by several significant accomplishments:
He graduated with a degree in law from the University of Rio de Janeiro.
He later earned a Ph.D. in law from Harvard University.
Unger served as Minister of Strategic Affairs and a member of the Brazilian Senate, where he played a key role in shaping Brazil's economic and social policies.Notable Works or Actions
Some of Roberto Mangabeira Unger's notable works include:
"The Critical Legal Studies Movement" (1987) - a book that critiques traditional legal scholarship.
"False Necessity: Theories of Social Order" (1975) - a philosophical work that explores the nature of social order and its relationship to human freedom.Impact and Legacy
Roberto Mangabeira Unger's contributions to philosophy, law, and politics have had a lasting impact on society:
His work has influenced critical legal studies, which challenges traditional notions of law and justice.
* As a politician, Unger has been instrumental in shaping Brazil's economic and social policies.
Why They Are Widely Quoted or Remembered
Roberto Mangabeira Unger is widely quoted and remembered for his thought-provoking ideas on social order, human freedom, and the role of law in society. His work continues to inspire scholars, politicians, and social activists around the world.
"The first thing you learn in politics is that you can never make a good second impression."
— Roberto Mangabeira Unger
Quotes by Roberto Mangabeira Unger
Roberto Mangabeira Unger's insights on:

The road back to reality, we suggest, begins by making two affirmations about nature: the uniqueness of the universe and the reality of time. These together have an immediate consequence which is the central hypothesis of our program: that the laws of nature evolve, and they do so through mechanisms that can be discovered and probed experimentally because they concern the past.

Our desires are insatiable. We seek from the limited the unlimited. We must fail. Our insatiability is a third incurable defect in human life.

In such a view, time is not emergent. It is, in fact, the only aspect of reality that cannot emerge from a more fundamental background. We register its reality, always and everywhere, by recognizing the differential character of change: some things change relative to other things. However, the kinds of things that there are also change, and so do the ways in which they change. That is what time is: the transformation of transformation.

To understand your country you must love it. To love it you must, in a sense, accept it. To accept it as it is, however, is to betray it. To accept your country without betraying it, you must love it for that in which it shows what it might become. America – this monument to the genius of ordinary men and women, this place where hope becomes capacity, this long, halting turn of the no into the yes – needs citizens who love it enough to reimagine and remake it.

Hope is more the consequence of action than its cause. As the experience of the spectator favors fatalism, so the experience of the agent produces hope.

The power worship of the Promethean amounts to a travesty of the enhancement of life.

Insofar we are death-bound, existence is urgent and frightful. Insofar as are groundless, it is vertiginous and dreamlike. Insofar as we are insatiable, it is unquiet and tormented.

So we must run back and forth between these two suns in our firmament—the presentiment of death and awareness of life—and avoid being transfixed by either of them. If we are lucky in this uncertain middle distance, we may form attachments and projects that enhance the sentiment of life. However, even as we try our luck, death comes to us, and brings our experiment to a end.

The embodied self is the same person who woke to the world in a burst of visonary immediacy, who soon found that he was not the center of that world but on the contrary, a dependent and even hapless creature, and who then discovered that he was doomed to die

If the self remains in its citadel, anxious to control and heavily defended, it declines in the sources of vitality. To lay the citadel open, however, is to court danger: a danger inseparable from the enhancement of life.